Jayne v. Google Internet Search Engine Founders
| Plaintiff: | Dylan Stephen Jayne |
|---|
| Defendant: | Google Internet Search Engine Founders |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 3:2007cv01677 |
| Filed: | September 18, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Pennsylvania Middle District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Scranton Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Pike |
| Presiding Judge: | Honorable James M. Munley |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause: | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| September 18, 2007 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Google Internet Search Engine Founders, filed by Dylan Stephen Jayne. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet # 2 Exhibit(s))(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 2 | MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 3 | BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 2 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 4 | MOTION to Expedite Summary Judgment Order by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 5 | MOTION to Expedite Summary Judgment Motion by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 6 | MOTION to file exhibits by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 7 | MOTION to Expedite filing of exhibits by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 8 | MOTION to Expedite Case by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 18, 2007 | 9 | MOTION to Expedite payment from Defendant by Dylan Stephen Jayne.(bg, ) |
| September 27, 2007 | 10 | MEMORANDUM and ORDER Granting Application to Proceed IFP; and DISMISSING case Signed by Judge James M. Munley on 9/27/07. (sm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.