Carter v. Georgetown County Sheriff's Department et al
| Rondell Leon Carter |
| Georgetown County Sheriff's Department and Georgetown City Police Department |
| 3:2009cv00779 |
| March 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Georgetown |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Joseph R McCrorey |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983pr (Other) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting summary judgment as to defendants Nelson and Todd and as to plaintiff's claims of false arrest and false imprisonment. Plaintiff's remaining claims under 1983 against defendants Bone, Picard, and Ward, are dismissed without prejudice, for 55 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on February 10, 2010. (kbos, )
|
|
Filing
55
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants Bone and Picard's motion for summary judgment be granted; defendant Ward's motion for summary judgment be granted; defendants Nelson & Todd's motion for summary judgment be granted, re 27 MOT ION for Summary Judgment filed by Brian Picard, Shep Bone, 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Nelson, Garry Todd, 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jason Ward, Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey on January 6, 2010. (kbos)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
