Taylor v. Myers et al
| Bo Anderson Taylor |
| Kelvin Myers, Stan Burt, NFN Jones and NFN Simmons |
| 8:2008cv02072 |
| June 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prison:Prison Condition Office |
| Allendale |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Henry M Herlong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 46 Report and Recommendations, that Defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Kelvin Myers, NFN Jones, NFN Simmons, Stan Burt, is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/27/09. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kelvin Myers, NFN Jones, NFN Simmons, Stan Burt, should be GRANTED and the plaintiff's claims DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust admin istrative remedies. If, however, the district court declines to adopt that recommendation, the plaintiff's claims should be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to create any issues of material fact concerning them. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 10/1/09. (kmca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
