Schaefer et al
Appellant: Louis E Schaefer, Jr and Schaefer Holdings, LP
Case Number: 4:2009cv00338
Filed: February 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Nancy F. Atlas
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE to allow direct appeal to Fifth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2).(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(TDR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schaefer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Louis E Schaefer, Jr
Represented By: Kenneth R Wynne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Schaefer Holdings, LP
Represented By: Kenneth R Wynne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?