SHEA v. POWELL
| 1:2002cv00577 |
| March 26, 2002 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| James Robertson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM OPINION explaining the Court's reasoning as to 146 , its Order denying plaintiff's summary judgment motion 74 and granting defendant's summary judgment motion 120 . Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 05/10/2013. (lcrcl4)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM OPINION explaining the Court's reasoning as to 137 , the Court's resolution of 129 . Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/7/2012. lrcl4)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 106 Motion for the Application of Judicial Estoppel. Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion 74 for Summary Judgment is due on or before August 13, 2012; and plaintiff's Reply, if any, is due on or before August 20, 2012. SO ORDERED.Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on July 30, 2012. (lcrcl4) Modified on 8/1/2012 (rje, ).
|
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 3/23/2012.(lcrcl5-intrcl3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHEA v. POWELL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
