BRADSHAW v. JOHANNS et al
Plaintiff: RODNEY BRADSHAW
Defendant: VERNON PARKER and MIKE JOHANNS
Case Number: 1:2004cv01422
Filed: August 23, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: John M. Facciola
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Friedman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 253 OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on September 2, 2021. (lcan)
August 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 235 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting plaintiff's motion in limine to sequester defense party representative Dwight Jurey 232 . Mr. Jurey will be excluded from the courtroom during the testimony of Mr. Bradshaw, but not during the testimony of any other witnesses. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on August 1, 2018. (MA)
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 231 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 212 defendant's motion in limine to admit evidence of subsequent FSA loan transactions. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on July 25, 2018. (MA)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 218 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that, on or before July 9, 2018, the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint proposal requesting the immediate designation of either a magistrate judge or a court-appointed mediator to assist in the final resolution of this matter. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on June 28, 2018. (MA)
December 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 201 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 191 defendant's motion in limine to exclude testimony regarding Mark Hendrickson. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on December 21, 2017. (MA)
December 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 198 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 190 defendant's motion to bifurcate. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on December 12, 2017. (MA)
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 164 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 150 motion for summary judgment filed by the United States Department of Agriculture. The parties shall file in writing a joint status report on or before May 22, 2015. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on May 5, 2015. (MA)
November 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 OPINION Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on 11/6/2012. (zmm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRADSHAW v. JOHANNS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODNEY BRADSHAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERNON PARKER
Represented By: Brian G. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE JOHANNS
Represented By: Marc A. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?