ALMERFEDI et al v. BUSH et al
1:2005cv01645 |
August 16, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
Paul L. Friedman |
Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 298 UNCLASSIFIED OPINION denying Petitioner's Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Classified opinion signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on October 26, 2012. (lcplf2) |
Filing 253 UNCLASSIFIED OPINION granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Hussain Salem Mohammed Almerfedi. Classified opinion signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on July 8, 2010. (lcplf2) |
Filing 229 ORDER that the government's motion to admit hearsay evidence with a presumption of accuracy and authenticity 207 is granted as to the admission of hearsay evidence and the presumption of authenticity and denied as to the presumption of accuracy. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on March 1, 2010.(MA) |
Filing 139 ORDER granting 136 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Traverse. Ordered that Petitioner's traverse shall be filed on or before 5/15/2009. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on 5/1/2009. (mm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ALMERFEDI et al v. BUSH et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.