ALHAG et al v. BUSH et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv02199
Filed: November 10, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Presiding Judge: Henry H. Kennedy
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 366 ORDER granting 365 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on January 30, 2013. (lcrcl2)
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 364 ORDER granting 362 Motion to Stay. Case is stayed until final resolution of the Counsel-Access question. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on Septemeber 27, 2012.(lcrcl2)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 361 ORDER granting 360 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Deadline for updated briefs and for petitioner's decision to testify is reset for September 21, 2012. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 20, 2012. (lcrcl2)
March 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM OPINION declining to consolidate petitions in 08-mc-0442 and recommending reassignment of fifteen petitions. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 2/27/09. (lctfh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALHAG et al v. BUSH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?