QATAR NATIONAL BANK v. WINMAR, INC.
| 1:2006cv01307 |
| July 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Gladys Kessler |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order granting in part and denying in part Winmar's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment to Include Attorneys' Fees and Costs Plus Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 12/28/11. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM OPINION to various Motions. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 12/21/11. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order granting in part and denying in part Al Jazeera's Objections to Magistrate Judge Facciola's Report & Recommendation. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 9/28/11. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order entering judgment in favor of Winmar, Inc.. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 9/29/10. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order granting Qatar National Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 9/3/09. (CL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: QATAR NATIONAL BANK v. WINMAR, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
