KAPCHE v. GONZALES
Plaintiff: JEFFREY KAPCHE
Defendant: ALBERTO GONZALES
Case Number: 1:2007cv02093
Filed: November 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge James Robertson on May 29, 2010. (MT)
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying defendant's motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial 104 . Signed by Judge James Robertson on September 11, 2009. (MT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KAPCHE v. GONZALES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY KAPCHE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALBERTO GONZALES
Represented By: Marsha Stelson Edney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?