PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff: PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND and UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Case Number: 1:2008cv00273
Filed: February 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed on 4/19/11 by Judge Richard D. Bennett, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.(jeb, )
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 16 Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; CENTCOM to conduct a search on certain documents no later than 4/1/10; Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment due 4/1/10; Plaintiff's Response to the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment due 4/30/10;Defendants' Reply to the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment due 5/21/10; Plaintiff's Cross Motion due 4/30/10; Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary due 5/21/10; Plaintiff's Reply to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment due 6/11/10; deferring a ruling with respect to the withholding s claimed by Joint Staff and DIA; directing the Joint Staff and the DIA to submit certain unredacted copies for in camera review by the Court by 2/1/10. Signed on 12/30/09 by Judge Richard D. Bennett, U.S.District Court for the District of Maryland,sitting by designation. (jeb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Represented By: Thomas M Susman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?