BRAYTON v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Plaintiff: ED BRAYTON
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Case Number: 1:2008cv00855
Filed: May 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Freedom of Information Act Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ricardo M. Urbina
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 9/28/09. (lcrmu2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRAYTON v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ED BRAYTON
Represented By: Bonnie I. Robin-Vergeer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?