HUTCHINSON v. HOLDER
Plaintiff: SELENA P. HUTCHINSON
Defendant: ERIC HOLDER
Case Number: 1:2009cv00718
Filed: April 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ellen S. Huvelle
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION to 44 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/3/2011. (lcjeb2)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on November 12, 2009. (lcesh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUTCHINSON v. HOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SELENA P. HUTCHINSON
Represented By: Elaine Lynette Fitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC HOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?