UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EIGHTEEN MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, INCLUDING WATCHES, RINGS, FISHING RODS, AND JEWELRY SEIZED DURING INVESTIGATION OF DAVID NIKOLOW

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EIGHTEEN MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, INCLUDING WATCHES, RINGS, FISHING RODS, AND JEWELRY SEIZED DURING INVESTIGATION OF DAVID NIKOLOW
Case Number: 1:2009cv00834
Filed: May 6, 2009
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Royce C. Lamberth
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EIGHTEEN MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, INCLUDING WATCHES, RINGS, FISHING RODS, AND JEWELRY SEIZED DURING INVESTIGATION OF DAVID NIKOLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Barry Wiegand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EIGHTEEN MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS, INCLUDING WATCHES, RINGS, FISHING RODS, AND JEWELRY SEIZED DURING INVESTIGATION OF DAVID NIKOLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.