AHUJA v. DETICA INC.

AHUJA v. DETICA INC.

Plaintiff:	KALPANA A. AHUJA
Defendant:	DETICA INC.
Case Number:	1:2009cv02246
Filed:	November 25, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office:	Washington, DC Office
County:	88888
Presiding Judge:	Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 16, 2012	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED insofar as it seeks the dismissal of Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claims under Count IV of the 1 Complaint based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust her a dministrative remedies. In addition, Count IV is DISMISSED insofar as it seeks relief under Section 1981, because such relief is duplicative of the relief sought in Count II. Because no other aspect of Count IV remains "live," Count IV is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count II is DISMISSED insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief for an alleged hostile work environment under Section 1981 for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. As a result, only the following claims remain live in this action: Count I remains live insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief under Title VII for discrete acts of discrimination based on race, sex, pregnancy, and national origin occurring on or after July 17, 2007 that are not based on hiring, compensation and benefits, performance evaluations, or demotions; and Count II remains live insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief under Section 1981 for discrete acts of discrimination or retaliation occurring on or after November 25, 2005. The Court understands only two employment actions to fall within the ambit of the live aspects of Counts I and II: (1) the alleged denial of a director-level promotion in or about November 2007; and (2) the termination of Plaintiff's employment on December 31, 2007. To the extent the Court's understanding is incorrect, by no later than May 1, 2012, Plaintiff shall file a Notice with the Court that identifies each and every employment action challenged through Counts I and II, as limited by the Court's dec isions, with precise citations to all the supporting allegations in the Complaint. A Scheduling Conference shall be held on May 21, 2012, at 11:30 a.m., before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Courtroom 28A on the Sixth Floor of the Courthouse Annex. The parties shall meet and confer and submit their Joint Statement in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 16.3 by no later than May 14, 2012, addressing each of the topics listed in Local Civil Rule 16.3(c) and providing a brief statement of the case and the bases for all causes of action and defenses. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on April 16, 2012. (lcckk3)
September 30, 2010	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 30, 2010. (lcckk2 )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 16, 2012

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED insofar as it seeks the dismissal of Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claims under Count IV of the 1 Complaint based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust her a dministrative remedies. In addition, Count IV is DISMISSED insofar as it seeks relief under Section 1981, because such relief is duplicative of the relief sought in Count II. Because no other aspect of Count IV remains "live," Count IV is DISMISSED in its entirety. Count II is DISMISSED insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief for an alleged hostile work environment under Section 1981 for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. As a result, only the following claims remain live in this action: Count I remains live insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief under Title VII for discrete acts of discrimination based on race, sex, pregnancy, and national origin occurring on or after July 17, 2007 that are not based on hiring, compensation and benefits, performance evaluations, or demotions; and Count II remains live insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief under Section 1981 for discrete acts of discrimination or retaliation occurring on or after November 25, 2005. The Court understands only two employment actions to fall within the ambit of the live aspects of Counts I and II: (1) the alleged denial of a director-level promotion in or about November 2007; and (2) the termination of Plaintiff's employment on December 31, 2007. To the extent the Court's understanding is incorrect, by no later than May 1, 2012, Plaintiff shall file a Notice with the Court that identifies each and every employment action challenged through Counts I and II, as limited by the Court's dec isions, with precise citations to all the supporting allegations in the Complaint. A Scheduling Conference shall be held on May 21, 2012, at 11:30 a.m., before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Courtroom 28A on the Sixth Floor of the Courthouse Annex. The parties shall meet and confer and submit their Joint Statement in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 16.3 by no later than May 14, 2012, addressing each of the topics listed in Local Civil Rule 16.3(c) and providing a brief statement of the case and the bases for all causes of action and defenses. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on April 16, 2012. (lcckk3)

September 30, 2010

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 30, 2010. (lcckk2 )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AHUJA v. DETICA INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KALPANA A. AHUJA
Represented By:	Richard Ethelbert Patrick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DETICA INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?