ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, INC. v. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP
Plaintiff: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, INC.
Defendant: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP
Case Number: 1:2010cv00454
Filed: March 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 8/26/2015. (hs)
November 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION. See text for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 11/26/2012. (lcjdb2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, INC. v. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, INC.
Represented By: Joseph E. DiGenova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?