ILLINOIS-MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER v. SEBELIUS
Plaintiff: ILLINOIS-MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Case Number: 1:2011cv00105
Filed: January 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Medicare Act
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 13 Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on 5/14/12. (Reed, Heather)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ILLINOIS-MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER v. SEBELIUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Represented By: Mitchell P. Zeff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ILLINOIS-MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER
Represented By: Kenneth R. Marcus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?