ANDRADES v. HOLDER
Plaintiff: HIRAM ANDRADES
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER
Case Number: 1:2011cv00305
Filed: February 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Beryl A. Howell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting motion for summary judgment 55 . Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on April 16, 2013. (lcrcl5)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 08/20/2012.(lcrcl4)
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on March 1, 2012. (lcrcl4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDRADES v. HOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HIRAM ANDRADES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?