BOYD v. SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.

Defendant: SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BOYD
Case Number: 1:2011cv00452
Filed: February 28, 2011
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Robert L. Wilkins
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 16, 2011 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 8/16/2011. (tcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOYD v. SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Andrea R. Calem
Represented By: Frank Charles Morris, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BOYD
Represented By: E. Scott Frison, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.