DIRECT SUPPLY, INC. v. SPECIALTY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA, LLC et al
| DIRECT SUPPLY, INC. |
| SPECIALTY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA, LLC, SPECIALTY HOSPITALS OF WASHINGTON, LLC and NOT-FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL CORPORATION |
| 1:2011cv00683 |
| April 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Emmet G. Sullivan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/17/13. The Court grants Direct Supply's motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract claim against Specialty Hospital and denies as moot all of Direct Supply's alternative claim s. Not-For-Profit Hospital Corporation's motions to dismiss, for summary judgment and to strike the affidavit of Jim Rappaport are denied as moot. Specialty Hospital is hereby ordered to pay $462,055.17 to Direct Supply along with interest, late charges, costs and attorney's fees. (Related Docs. 15 , 41 , 42 , 47 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/18/12. The Court, as set forth in this entry, denies Specialty Hospital's motions to dismiss Counts I and II of the complaint. The Court grants in part and denies in part Not-For-Profit Hospital's motion to dismiss Counts III and IV with Count III being dismissed and Count IV remaining. (Related Docs. 3 , 4 , 7 ) (Gwin, James)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
