WAY v. JOHNSON et al
| JOHN L. WAY, SR. |
| ISAAC FULWOOD, ISAAC JOHNSON, RICHARDSON, SHARON MAYS-JACKS, SINGLETARY, RUSSELL WILLIAMS, BARNO, SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, THOMAS H. WILLIAMS and BRYAN YOUNG |
| 1:2011cv01182 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Richard J. Leon |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this 26th day of September 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 3006A 13 is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that De fendants Warden Simon T. Wainwright and Warden Isaac Johnson's Motion for Additional Time to FIle a Response to the Complaint 28 are GRANTED nunc pro tunc; it is further ORDERED that Warden Simon T. Wainwright's Motion to Dismiss or in t he Alternative For Summary Judgment 19 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant Isaac Johnson's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 29 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as to all defendants. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P.4(a). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 9/26/2012. (see order) (kc )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
