UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE GULFSTREAM G-V JET AIRCRAFT

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ONE GULFSTREAM G-V JET AIRCRAFT
Case Number: 1:2011cv01874
Filed: October 25, 2011
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 19, 2013 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4/19/2013. (lcrc3)
May 9, 2014 46 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 42 Claimant's Motion for a Protective Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 05/09/2014. (lcrc3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE GULFSTREAM G-V JET AIRCRAFT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Woo S. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ONE GULFSTREAM G-V JET AIRCRAFT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.