RESTRAINT OF ALL ASSETS CONTAINED OR FORMERLY CONTAINED IN INVESTMENT ACCOUNT NUMBERS AT UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., HELD IN THE NAMES OF PONSFORD OVERSEAS LIMITED, CARIBBEAN INVESTMENT GROUP LTD.,
Case Number: 1:2011mc00452
Filed: August 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, the United States' 8 Motion to Amend is GRANTED and Ponsford and Tula's 9 Motion to Dissolve is DENIED. An appropriate restraining order accompanies this Memorandum Opini on and Order. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of any Article 150 proceedings concerning the three UBS accounts in the Curacao Court. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on May 17, 2012. (lcckk3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RESTRAINT OF ALL ASSETS CONTAINED OR FORMERLY CONTAINED IN INVESTMENT ACCOUNT NUMBERS AT UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., HELD IN THE NAMES OF PONSFORD OVERSEAS LIMITED, CARIBBEAN INVESTMENT GROUP LTD.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?