WILLIAMS v. DONLEY et al

WILLIAMS v. DONLEY et al

Plaintiff:	MARCUS L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:	MICHAEL B. DONLEY and ALFRED STEWART
Case Number:	1:2013cv00968
Filed:	June 26, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office:	Washington, DC Office
County:	88888
Presiding Judge:	Ketanji Brown Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 11, 2014	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING 16 The Plaintiff[s] Motion for Summary Judgment, 32 Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, and 40 Leave Request for Plaintiff Marcus L. Williams to File [a] Second Amended Response to Defendants[] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 21 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 08/11/2014. (lckbj1)
June 26, 2013	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Ordered granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered that the plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Declartory Judgment and Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Judgment are dismissed. Ordered that this action shall be opened as brought under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a and randomly assigned to a district judge for futher proceedings. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 06/13/2013. (zmr)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 11, 2014

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING 16 The Plaintiff[s] Motion for Summary Judgment, 32 Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, and 40 Leave Request for Plaintiff Marcus L. Williams to File [a] Second Amended Response to Defendants[] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 21 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 08/11/2014. (lckbj1)

June 26, 2013

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Ordered granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered that the plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Declartory Judgment and Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Judgment are dismissed. Ordered that this action shall be opened as brought under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §552a and randomly assigned to a district judge for futher proceedings. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 06/13/2013. (zmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. DONLEY et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL B. DONLEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ALFRED STEWART
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARCUS L. WILLIAMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?