LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff: LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC.
Case Number: 1:2013cv01219
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26:7428 IRS: Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC.
Represented By: Christopher Allan Glaser
Represented By: Robert N. Kelly
Represented By: Nancy Ortmeyer Kuhn
Represented By: James N. Markels
Represented By: Michael S. Pasano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.