WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. LOCAL 689 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Defendant: LOCAL 689 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Case Number: 1:2015cv00536
Filed: April 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Rosemary M. Collyer
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on June 29, 2015. (lcrmc3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. LOCAL 689 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Represented By: Harvey A. Levin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOCAL 689 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Represented By: Douglas Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?