DODSON v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Plaintiff: ARREN DODSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Case Number: 1:2018cv02680
Filed: November 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Randolph D Moss
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/26/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/25/2019. (Mechak, Megan)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/26/18. (Mechak, Megan)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE served on 11/26/2018 (Mechak, Megan)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE served on 12/7/2018 (Mechak, Megan)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/3/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/1/2019. (Mechak, Megan)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/3/18. (Mechak, Megan)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/19/2018. (lcrdm3, )
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Hillary Diana LeBeau on behalf of ARREN DODSON (LeBeau, Hillary)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, )
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5799312) filed by ARREN DODSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Summons Summons, #5 Summons Summons)(Mechak, Megan)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zef, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DODSON v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARREN DODSON
Represented By: Hillary Diana LeBeau
Represented By: Megan Kathleen Mechak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?