EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
| STEPHEN S. EDWARDS |
| CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2019cv03614 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant Answer Or Otherwise Response To Plaintiff's Complaint due by 4/3/2020. (mac)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant United States shall file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than April 3, 2020. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 1/31/2020. (lcegs3)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION. Attorney April Denise Seabrook terminated. (Seabrook, April)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Seabrook, April)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. On January 7, 2020, Chambers received a voicemail message from Mr. Edwards regarding this matter. To avoid ex parte communications, the Court prohibits telephone calls from parties. Mr. Edwards is reminded to comply with this Court's Standing Order. Standing Order, ECF No. #3 at 2 3(b) ("Parties are to communicate with the Court in writing by motion, opposition, and reply; not by letter or telephone call."). The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to Mr. Edwards' address of record via first-class mail, certified receipt. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 1/7/2020. (lcegs3)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Default Judgment by STEPHEN S. EDWARDS (eg)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by April Denise Seabrook on behalf of All Defendants (Seabrook, April)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 12/5/19. (Attachment: Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of #2 Plaintiff's Notice to Receive Electronic Notifications, the Court construes Mr. Edwards' request that "all Notifications be served upon [his] E-Mail address" as a "Motion for CM/ECF User Name and Password." To obtain the Court's permission for a CM/ECF user name and password from the Clerk of Court, Mr. Edwards must meet the requirements set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.4(b)(2). Because Mr. Edwards has failed to comply with Local Civil Rule 5.4(b)(2), Mr. Edwards' request, ECF No. 2, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to Mr. Edwards' address of record via first-class mail, certified receipt. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 12/4/2019. (lcegs3)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to receive electronic notifications by STEPHEN S. EDWARDS (jf)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616101660) with Jury Demand filed by STEPHEN S. EDWARDS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jf)
|
|
SUMMONS (3) Issued as to CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jf)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
