COLELLA et al v. ANDROUS et al
JOHN J. ZEFUTIE, JR. and UGO COLELLA |
THOMAS T. ANDROUS, 2208 RUSSEL ROAD, LLC and 2208 RR AVA, LLC |
1:2020cv00813 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Reply due by 5/29/2020. (tj) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing, #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing by 2208 RUSSEL ROAD, LLC, THOMAS T. ANDROUS, 2208 RR AVA, LLC (Hoge, Christopher) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #13 Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall file their reply in support of their #9 , #10 motions to dismiss on or before May 29, 2020. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/15/2020. (lcrc1) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in opposition to re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing, #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed by UGO COLELLA, JOHN J. ZEFUTIE, JR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Colella, Ugo) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 5/13/2020 (tj) |
Filing 11 FOX/NEAL ORDER advising Plaintiffs to respond by May 13, 2020 to #9 , #10 Defendants' motions to dismiss or the Court may deem the matter conceded. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4/13/2020. (lcrc1) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing by 2208 RR AVA, LLC (Hoge, Christopher) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing by 2208 RUSSEL ROAD, LLC, THOMAS T. ANDROUS (Hoge, Christopher) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. 2208 RR AVA, LLC served on 3/30/2020, answer due 4/20/2020 (Colella, Ugo) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. THOMAS T. ANDROUS served on 3/30/2020, answer due 4/20/2020 (Colella, Ugo) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. 2208 RUSSEL ROAD, LLC served on 3/30/2020, answer due 4/20/2020 (Colella, Ugo) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #3 Affidavit; emailed to ucolella@czlaw.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect event used, 2. Please refile document, 3. Docket Entries [3-5] were entered in error. The correct event can be found under the Service of Process heading. (ztth, ) |
Filing 5 ENTERED IN ERROR.....AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVER FOR SERVICE UPON 2208 RR AVA, LLC by UGO COLELLA. (Colella, Ugo); Modified on 3/31/2020 (ztth). |
Filing 4 ENTERED IN ERROR.....AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVER FOR SERVICE UPON THOMAS T. ANDROUS by UGO COLELLA. (Colella, Ugo); Modified on 3/31/2020 (ztth). |
Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR....,.AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVER FOR SERVICE UPON 2208 RUSSELL ROAD, LLC by UGO COLELLA. (Colella, Ugo); Modified on 3/31/2020 (ztth). |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to 2208 RUSSEL ROAD, LLC, THOMAS T. ANDROUS, 2208 RR AVA, LLC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6953975) filed by Ugo Colella. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons Defendant Androus, #4 Summons Summons Defendant 2208 Russell Road, #5 Summons Summons Defendant 2208 RR AVA)(Colella, Ugo) |
Case assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.