Schara v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Inc

Plaintiff: Christine Schara
Defendant: Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Inc
Case Number: 3:2010cv00057
Filed: July 30, 2010
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Athens Office
County: Clarke
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 4, 2013 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 18 Motion to Exclude. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 03/04/2013.(aaf)
March 19, 2013 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 30 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 03/19/2013.(aaf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schara v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Schara
Represented By: James E. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.