District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 157,612
Afzali v. CWU, Inc
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ismael Afzali
Defendant:
CWU, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Hinesville Housing Authority et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hinesville Housing Authority, Hineshouse Property Management and Maintenance Service, Inc., Hinesville Leased Housing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Jump et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Jump, Glynn County Detention Center and M. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WATSON v. SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
HUGH ZACHARY WATSON
Respondent:
SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GREEN v. DUETZ et al
as 3:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
CARMEN D GREEN
Defendant:
DUETZ and JASON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Anthony v. HNN Atlanta Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04425
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Anthony
Defendant:
HNN Atlanta Inc. and Michelle Hollberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
