US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,086
Munns v. Rich Products Corporation
as 2:2023cv00111
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morgan v. Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Afzali v. CWU, Inc
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ismael Afzali
Defendant:
CWU, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Hinesville Housing Authority et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hinesville Housing Authority, Hineshouse Property Management and Maintenance Service, Inc., Hinesville Leased Housing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Jump et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Jump, Glynn County Detention Center and M. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Effingham Health Systems Foundation, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Effingham Health System Foundation, Inc. doing business as Effingham Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sallen v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00286
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alonzo Sallen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carter v. United States Of America
as 5:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Ashley Marshall Carter
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
