Traylor et al v. Talleres Daumar S.L. et al
| Patrick Traylor and Yisbel Deleon-Traylor |
| Talleres Daumar S.L., Daumar Group and Daumar Corporation |
| 4:2024cv00080 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| R Stan Baker |
| J Randal Hall |
| Christopher L Ray |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1) by Daumar Corporation. (O'Brien, Jay) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave of Absence for attorney Jay M. O'Brien for the dates of June 7-10, June 14-17, June 21-24, and July 30 - August 7, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/1/2024. (wwp) Modified on 5/1/2024 (wwp).
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave of Absence as to Daumar Corporation for dates of : June 7-10, June 14-17, June 21-24, and July 30 - August 7, 2024 by Daumar Corporation. Responses due by 5/14/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order granting leave of absence.)(O'Brien, Jay) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary R. Sprouse on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sprouse, Zachary) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1) by Yisbel Deleon-Traylor, Patrick Traylor. (Shipley, James) |
| Filing 12 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Yisbel Deleon-Traylor, Patrick Traylor. (Shipley, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re: 7 Notice. (csr) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John Bell Manly on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Manly, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by James Everett Shipley, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Shipley, James) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge J. Randal Hall for all further proceedings. District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 4/30/2024. (maa)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Daumar Corporation.(O'Brien, Jay) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #15 MOTION for Leave of Absence as to Daumar Corporation for dates of: June 7-10, June 14-17, June 21-24, and July 30 - August 7, 2024. (csr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 5/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Disclosure Statement)(wwp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to all counsel of record that a #1 Notice of Removal was filed in the Southern District of Georgia. Set/Reset Deadlines: Daumar Corporation answer due 5/2/2024. Appearance Compliance due by 5/5/2024. State Motions due by 5/9/2024. (wwp) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Standing Order regarding cases pending before District Judge R. Stan Baker. (#Click Here to View Standing Order) RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/25/24. (wwp)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Daumar Corporation from State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, case number STCV24-00581. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGA-SDC - 3813386), filed by Daumar Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Complaint and summons, #3 State Certificate)(wwp) |
| Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
