ROEBUCK v. CRICKMAR
Petitioner: JAVARIOUS ROEBUCK
Respondent: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Case Number: 3:2014cv00071
Filed: July 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Athens Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Presiding Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER dismissing without prejudice 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAVARIOUS ROEBUCK. Petitioner is Denied a Certificate of Appealability and is thus, not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 9/10/14. (lap) ***
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROEBUCK v. CRICKMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAVARIOUS ROEBUCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?