DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC v. HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
Plaintiff: DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC
Defendant: HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
Case Number: 4:2011cv00195
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Columbus Office
County: Muscogee
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; terminating as moot 63 Motion to Exclude. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land on 11/19/2013 (jcs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC v. HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC
Represented By: Travis C. Hargrove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?