WRIGHT et al v. S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS

Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ARRINGTON and DANIEL WRIGHT
Defendant: S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
Case Number: 4:2013cv00043
Filed: February 15, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WRIGHT et al v. S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ARRINGTON
Represented By: Christopher Lee Meacham
Represented By: RICHARD MICHAEL KEMMER, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIEL WRIGHT
Represented By: Christopher Lee Meacham
Represented By: RICHARD MICHAEL KEMMER, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
Represented By: Theodore D. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.