SNOWBALL v. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

Respondent: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Petitioner: DANE RICARDO SNOWBALL
Case Number: 4:2013cv00119
Filed: May 1, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: Stewart
Referring Judge: Stephen Hyles
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 5, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; adopting 15 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land on 11/5/2013 (tlf).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SNOWBALL v. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DANE RICARDO SNOWBALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.