Cook (DEATH PENALTY) v. Hall

Petitioner: Andrew Allen Cook
Respondent: Hilton Hall
Case Number: 5:2009cv00025
Filed: February 6, 2009
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty Office
County: Butts
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2010 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andrew Allen Cook. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 3/18/10. (lap)
August 26, 2010 45 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 41 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 8/26/10 (lap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook (DEATH PENALTY) v. Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew Allen Cook
Represented By: Thomas H. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hilton Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.