Marshall v. Upson County Sheriff's Department et al
| Willie Bernard Marshall, Sr |
| Upson County Sheriff's Department, Jonathan Busbee, Norman L Donati and Andrew Nickson |
| 5:2009cv00382 |
| October 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Upson |
| Claude W. Hicks, Jr. |
| C. Ashley Royal |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER for Response to 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jonathan Busbee. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Charles H. Weigle on 9/2/11. (mgb)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Adopting 29 Report and Recommendations; denying 32 Motion to Grant Relief; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Searcy is Dismissed from this action. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 7/27/10 (lap)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Donati, Nickson, and the Upson County Sheriff's Department are Dismissed.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 1/22/10 (lap)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint, as supplemented, filed by Willie Bernard Marshall, Sr. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 12/15/09. (CWH)
|
|
Filing
4
Order to Supplement Complaint; Order Granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Willie Bernard Marshall, Sr. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 10/29/2009. (mgb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
