BUTTS (DEATH PENALTY) v. CHATMAN et al
| BRUCE CHATMAN |
| ROBERT EARL BUTTS |
| GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON |
| 5:2013cv00194 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Butts |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING 54 Motion Relief From a Final Judgment, Order, Or Proceeding Pursuant to Federal Rule 60(b) and DENYING 60 Motion to Stay. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/23/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ROBERT EARL BUTTS. The Court issues a COA on the following issue: Trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to investigate, develop, and present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of Butts's trial. In relation to all other claims, grounds, and issues raised in 1 Butts's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court finds the standard for the grant of a COA has not been met. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 10/16/2015. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 19 Motion for Discovery and an Evidentiary Hearing and instructs the Parties to comply with the September 30, 2013 Scheduling Order for future briefs. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 1/15/2014. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
