BRIDGES v. PERFORMANT RECOVERY INC
Plaintiff: STERLING BRIDGES
Defendant: PERFORMANT RECOVERY INC
Case Number: 5:2015cv00038
Filed: February 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING 26 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 8/26/2016. (tlh)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and dismissing this case with prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 12/14/15 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRIDGES v. PERFORMANT RECOVERY INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STERLING BRIDGES
Represented By: MARQUES JAMIL CARTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PERFORMANT RECOVERY INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?