THOMAS v. NELSON
Petitioner: THEODORE LAWRENCE THOMAS
Respondent: NELSON
Case Number: 5:2015cv00089
Filed: March 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: STEPHEN HYLES
Presiding Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by THEODORE LAWRENCE THOMAS, directing Petitioner to refile 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on the proper section 2254 form provided by the Clerk and to pay the $5 filing fee within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 3-19-15. (mpm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS v. NELSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: THEODORE LAWRENCE THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NELSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?