CERTUSBANK NA v. THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC et al
CERTUSBANK NA |
THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC, CCS DEVELOPMENT INC, GILLIARD TRUCKING INC and KENNETH SAMS THAXTON |
5:2015cv00143 |
April 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Crawford |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to submit a proposed judgment within seven (7) days of the date of this Order addressing the amount due on the Note and the amount of attorneys fees due. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/23/17 (lap) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 26 Motion to Substitute Party. RREF II CER CO Acquisitions, LLC is SUBSTITUTED as the Plaintiff in this action and shall be listed as the Plaintiff on all subsequent pleadings and filings in t his matter. Laurel Creek Spainhour and William K. Carmichael and the law firm Stokes Carmichael & Ernst LLP shall remain as counsel of record for Plaintiff RREF in this matter. It is further ORDERED that CertusBank is hereby RELEASED from this action without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 6/1/2016. (tlh) |
Filing 22 ORDER DENYING without prejudice 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are hereby DIRECTED to submit a revised Scheduling and Discovery Order within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 1/29/2016. (tlh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.