BARKER v. FERRER et al
Plaintiff: ANTONIO BARKER
Defendant: ALBERTO FERRER, RICHARD GATLIN, RANDY GONZALEZ and DAVID DAVIS
Case Number: 5:2021cv00381
Filed: October 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: TILMAN E SELF
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 AMENDED DOCUMENT by RANDY GONZALEZ,amending #13 Answer to Complaint (LEWIS, DAWN)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 AMENDED DOCUMENT by RICHARD GATLIN,amending #12 Answer to Complaint (LEWIS, DAWN)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AMENDED DOCUMENT by DAVID DAVIS,amending #11 Answer to Complaint (LEWIS, DAWN)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RULES 16/26 ORDER: Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 1/6/2022. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 12/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(chc)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (IFP), by ALBERTO FERRER with Jury Demand.(NOLAND, WILLIAM)Attorney WILLIAM H NOLAND added to party ALBERTO FERRER(pty:dft)
November 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (IFP), by RANDY GONZALEZ with Jury Demand.(LEWIS, DAWN)Attorney DAWN M LEWIS added to party RANDY GONZALEZ(pty:dft)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (IFP), by RICHARD GATLIN with Jury Demand.(LEWIS, DAWN)Attorney DAWN M LEWIS added to party RICHARD GATLIN(pty:dft)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (IFP), by DAVID DAVIS with Jury Demand.(LEWIS, DAWN)Attorney DAWN M LEWIS added to party DAVID DAVIS(pty:dft)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANTONIO BARKER as to ALBERTO FERRER. (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANTONIO BARKER as to RANDY GONZALEZ. (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANTONIO BARKER as to RICHARD GATLIN. (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANTONIO BARKER as to DAVID DAVIS. (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Affidavit filed by ANTONIO BARKER, #5 Affidavit filed by ANTONIO BARKER, #6 Affidavit filed by ANTONIO BARKER ); Document must be re-filed using correct event which is Summons Returned Executed.(hdw)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT Proof of Service of Randy Gonzalez by ANTONIO BARKER (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT Proof of Service of Richard Gatlin by ANTONIO BARKER (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT Proof of Service of David Davis by ANTONIO BARKER (FREDRICKSON, ERIC)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing Petitioner to either pay the filing fee or move to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have 21 days from the date of this Order to either pay $402.00 fee or file proper and complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 11/2/2021. (chc)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons David Davis, #2 Summons Randy Gonzalez, #3 Summons Richard Gatlin)(hdw)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by ANTONIO BARKER (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (Ferrer), #3Summons (Gatlin), #4Summons (Gonzalez), #5 Summons (Davis))(FREDRICKSON, ERIC)***PAID $402 Receipt Number: 183504*** Modified on 10/29/2021 to edit docket text (hdw). Modified on 11/3/2021 to add payment info(hdw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARKER v. FERRER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTONIO BARKER
Represented By: ERIC FREDRICKSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALBERTO FERRER
Represented By: WILLIAM H NOLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD GATLIN
Represented By: DAWN M LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDY GONZALEZ
Represented By: DAWN M LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID DAVIS
Represented By: DAWN M LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?