Schutz Container Systems, Inc. et al v. Mauser Corp. et al
Protechna S.A. and Schutz Container Systems, Inc. |
National Container Group, LLC and Mauser Corp. |
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. and Protechna S.A. |
National Container Group, LLC and Mauser Corp. |
1:2009cv03609 |
December 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
XX US, Outside State |
Story |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 359 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Putative Expert Testimony from Michael Laskinski 307 is GRANTED as to any testimony based upon his appointment calculation. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Survey and Testimony of Dr. Kenneth Bernha rdt 308 is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence, Testimony, or Argument Regarding Defendants' Reconditioned IBC's 309 is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike Witnesses is GRANTED IN PART an d DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff will be permitted to call Mr. Leddy as a witness. However, as to the remaining witnesses disclosed by Plaintiff, those witnesses may be called solely to authenticate documents if Defendants are unwilling to stipulate to au thentication. Defendants' Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony From Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Sher Paul Singh 311 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and/or for Leave to File Sur-Reply 345 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 3/31/2014. (cem) |
Filing 276 ORDER: Plaintiff's 274 Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Schutz Container Systems, Inc.'s 184 Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant National Container Group, LL C's Counterclaims is GRANTED. Defendants Mauser Corporation and National Container Group, LLC's 187 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Trademark Claims (Counts II, IV-VI) is DENIED. Finally, Defendant Mauser Corporation and N ational Container Group, LLC's 188 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's False Advertising Claims (Counts III-VI) and Unjust Enrichment Claim (Count VII) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff 039;s False Advertising Claims (Counts III-VI) to the extent these claims are based on accused Statements 1, 2, 4, 7-9, 11-14, and 30, the motion is DENIED to the extent these claims are based on Statements 26-28. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Unjust Enrichment Claim (Count VII). Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 3/28/12. (cem) |
Filing 169 ORDER denying 144 Defendants' Motion to Compel Deposition of Udo Schutz; granting 151 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Precluding the Deposition of Udo Schutz; and denying 159 Defendants' Emergency Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 4/19/11. (cem) |
Filing 101 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Defendants' Motion to Amend theirAnswer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims; and denying as moot 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Surreply Brief. Defendants are granted leave to amend their affirmative defenses to reflect the dismissal of Plaintiffs patent claims and to add claims under the Lanham Act and the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act against existing Plaintiff, but are denied leave to join additional Counter-Defendants Schtz GmbH & Co. KGaA, Schtz-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, and Schtz Verwaltungs GmbH. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 12/07/2010. (pdw) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Strike Defendants' Sixteenth Affirmative Defense; granting Defendants' 32 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Doctrine of Equivalents Infringement Contentions. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 06/11/10. (sk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.