Atlantic Pacific Equipment, Inc. v. Graham
Plaintiff: Atlantic Pacific Equipment, Inc.
Defendant: William Dale Graham
Case Number: 1:2012cv03306
Filed: September 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Cobb
Presiding Judge: Thomas W. Thrash
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 7 Motion to Transfer Case.; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 2/8/2013. (ss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlantic Pacific Equipment, Inc. v. Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Dale Graham
Represented By: Michael Scot Rosenthal
Represented By: Steven Bradley Shipe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlantic Pacific Equipment, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Edward Solley
Represented By: Douglas Hanson Duerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?