Goodridge v. Quantum Servicing Corporation et al

Plaintiff: Vanessa Goodridge
Defendant: Quantum Servicing Corporation and Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00778
Filed: March 12, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Gwinnett
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Referring Judge: Linda T. Walker
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodridge v. Quantum Servicing Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Goodridge
Represented By: Deirdre M. Stephens-Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quantum Servicing Corporation
Represented By: James Zachary Zimmerman
Represented By: Kevin L. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Represented By: Howell Alexander Hall
Represented By: Louis G. Fiorilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.