Ford et al v. 1280 West Condominium Association, Inc. et al
| Kimberly Ford and Mildred Robinson |
| 1280 West Condominium Association, Inc. and Beacon Management Services, LLC |
| 1280 West Condominium Association, Inc. |
| Kimberly Ford and Mildred Robinson |
| 1:2014cv00527 |
| February 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Fulton |
| Richard W. Story |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER granting Defendant's 84 Motion for Attorney Fees, and the Court awards fees of $1,890.00 to Defendant 1280 West Condominium Association and against Plaintiffs. Plaintiff's 86 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Defendant� 39;s 92 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 94 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant 1280 West Condominium Asso ciation are DISMISSED. The remaining parties are DIRECTED to confer in an effort to agree on a proposed scheduling order. If the parties cannot agree, the parties are DIRECTED to so inform the Court, and the Court will set a scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/5/2015. (cem)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER: (1) Defendants' Motion to Strike 37 is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Filing of Documents 19, 50, and 52 56 is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike the Associations Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 59 is DENIED; (4) Defendant Weibel's Motion to Dismiss 40 is GRANTED; (5) Defendant Paine's Motion to Dismiss 77 is GRANTED; (6) Defendants' Amended Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 41 is GRANTED in part and DENI ED in part. It is GRANTED as to the disparate impact claim in Count I, the breach of contract claim based on deactivation of the access cards in Count II, Count III in its entirety, and the fraud claim in Count V. It is DENIED as to all other claims ; (7) The Association's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Its Counterclaim 38 is GRANTED; (8) Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 64 is DENIED; (9) Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 78 is DENIED; (10) Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 61 is GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED to file a joint proposed scheduling order concerning the extension of discovery within 14 days of the date of this Order. If the parties cann ot come to an agreement, each side shall file its own proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration within 14 days of the date of this Order. (11) Defendant Association's Motion to Compel Discovery 81 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ORDERED, within 7 days of the entry of this Order, to provide complete and verified responses to the First Interrogatories and the First Document Request. Plaintiffs have waived any opportunity to object to the discovery by failing to respond in a ti mely fashion. Further, the facts set out in the First Admissions Request are deemed admitted. The Association is entitled to attorney's fees for the bringing of this Motion. The Association shall file a statement of fees within 7 days of the entry of this Order, and Plaintiffs shall have 7 days thereafter to file objections, if any. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/2/2014. (cem)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 2 Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 4/17/2014. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
