Lovett v. SJAC Fulton IND I, LLC et al
| Ayotunda Lovett |
| SJAC Fulton IND I, LLC, SJAC Food Groups, LLC and Does 1 through 10 |
| 1:2014cv00983 |
| April 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| De Kalb |
| Justin S Anand |
| William S. Duffey |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
214
ORDER AND OPINION. Plaintiff Ayotunda Lovett's Objections 202 to the R&R are DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants SJAC Fulton IND I, LLC and SJAC Food Groups, LLC's Objections 203 to the R&R are SUSTAINED with respect to whether SJAC Food Groups was Plaintiffs employer under the FLSA. They are DENIED AS MOOT with respect to whether Plaintiff was exempt under the FLSA. Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand's May 2, 2016, Report and Recommendation 200 is ADOPTED with respect to Plaintiffs FLSA claim against SJAC Fulton IND and Plaintiffs Title VII claims. It is NOT ADOPTED with respect to Plaintiffs FLSA claim against SJAC Food Groups. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 163 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 164 is DENIED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 8/22/2016. (bgt)
|
|
Filing
196
OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 143 , and Motion to Supplement the Record on Conditional Certification 145 , are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude or in the Alternative Motion to Strike the July 17, 2015, Declaration of Jonathan Rodriguez 148 is DENIED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/24/2016. (anc)
|
|
Filing
142
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING in part 103 Report and Recommendation. The portions of the R&R regarding the Court's jurisdiction and denying conditional certification of a class including Shift Supervisors, are ADOPTED. To the extent the Magistr ate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification be granted in part, the Court SUSTAINS Defendants' Objections 128 and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that Plaintiff be found similarly situated t o other Assistant Managers and that a class of Assistant Managers be conditionally certified, is NOT ADOPTED. The Court, on de novo review, finds that Plaintiff is not similarly situated to other Assistant Managers and determines, in its discretion, to deny conditional certification. DENYING 15 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; DENYING 14 Motion to Certify Class; DENYING AS MOOT 16 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT 19 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal; DENYING AS MOOT 107 Motion to Decertify Class; the 113 Report and Recommendation and 118 Report and Recommendation are NOT ADOPTED because they are moot; GRANTING 123 Motion to Strike 121 Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 6/23/2015. (adg) Modified on 6/23/2015 (adg).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
