Mavromatis et al v. Murphy
| Fedon Mavromatis and Elisabeth Mavromatis |
| Duncan Scott Murphy |
| 1:2014cv03469 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William S. Duffey |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Duncan Scott Murphy's Rule 32(a)(6) Motion and Objections Regarding Plaintiffs' Deposition Designations 110 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 6/16/2016. (bgt)
|
|
Filing
101
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Duncan Scott Murphys Motions in Limine 93 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court GRANTS, in accordance with this Opinion and Order, Defendants Motions in Limine to exclude (a) evidence of Plaintiffs inability to pay medical expenses, (b) evidence concerning the parties liability insurance coverage, (c) voir dire questions concerning insurance, unless a prospective juror states that he or she works for an insurance company, (d) arguments or allegations suggesting that jurors should, in awarding damages, put themselves in Plaintiffs position, (e) evidence relating to Defendants prior or subsequent traffic citations or driving record, (f) evidence of Defendants criminal record, absent a certified co py of a felony conviction or a misdemeanor crime involving moral turpitude, and (g) evidence concerning settlement negotiations. The Court DENIES Defendants Motion in Limine to exclude evidence that Defendant made modifications or repairs to his veh icle. Plaintiffs Fedon Mavromatis and Elisabeth Mavromatis Consolidated Motions in Limine 92 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court GRANTS, in accordance with this Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs Motions in Limine to exclude (a) evidence or argument that a verdict against Defendant may negatively impact his life, (b) evidence of the parties financial status, (c) evidence of Plaintiffs medical payments from collateral sources, (d) evidence regarding the amount of Defendants insurance coverage for the accident, (e) evidence of when Plaintiffs contacted or retained counsel, (f) suggestion or implication that Plaintiffs are greedy, (g) statements that Plaintiffs, by pursuing this action, are playing the lottery or gambling, (h) statements regarding the tax implications of any verdict, (i) statements regarding the effect of any verdict on insurance rates, premiums or charges, and (j) any ad hominem attacks on the lawyers in this action. The Court DENIES, in accordance with this Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs Motions in Limine to exclude (a) medical records from Plaintiffs primary care physician, (b) evidence or argument, unsupported by medical testimony, that Plaintiffs injuries were caused other than by the car accid ent at issue, (c) evidence or argument, unsupported by medical proof, that Plaintiffs are malingering or exaggerating their injuries, (d) evidence or argument that Plaintiffs caused or contributed to the collision, (e) statements of regret or remorse from Defendant, and (f) argument or suggestion that the collision was an accident. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 5/26/2016. (bgt)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER that Defendant Duncan Scott Murphy's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 56 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Duncan Scott Murphy's Motion for Oral Argument 63 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Fedon Mavromatis' and Elisabeth Mavromatis' Motion for Leave to File Surreply 65 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/18/2016. (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
